ZOCOR
Available from Value Pharmaceuticals at discount price
CONTRAINDICATIONS 
  
Hypersensitivity to any component of this medication. 
  
Active liver disease or unexplained persistent elevations of serum transaminases (see 
WARNINGS). 
  
Pregnancy and Lactation: Atherosclerosis is a chronic process and the discontinuation 
of lipid-lowering drugs during pregnancy should have little impact on the outcome of 
long-term therapy of primary hypercholesterolemia. Moreover, cholesterol and other 
products of the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway are essential components for fetal 
development, including synthesis of steroids and cell membranes. Because of the ability of 
inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase such as simvastatin to decrease the synthesis of 
cholesterol and possibly other products of the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway, 
simvastatin is contraindicated during pregnancy and in nursing mothers. Simvastatin 
should be administered to women of childbearing age only when such patients are 
highly unlikely to conceive. If the patient becomes pregnant while taking this drug, 
simvastatin should be discontinued immediately and the patient should be apprised of the 
potential hazard to the fetus (see PRECAUTIONS, Pregnancy Category X). 
  
WARNINGS 
  
Skeletal Muscle 
  
Simvastatin and other inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase occasionally cause myopathy, 
which is manifested as muscle pain or weakness associated with grossly elevated creatine 
kinase (CK) (>10´ the upper limit of normal [ULN]). Rhabdomyolysis, with or without 
acute renal failure secondary to myoglobinuria, has been reported rarely. In 4S, 
there was one case of myopathy among 1399 patients taking simvastatin 20 mg and no 
cases among 822 patients taking 40 mg/day for a median duration of 5.4 years. In two 
6-month controlled clinical studies, there was one case of myopathy among 436 patients 
taking 40 mg and 5 cases among 669 patients taking 80 mg. The risk of myopathy is 
increased by concomitant therapy with certain drugs, some of which were excluded by 
the designs of these studies (see Myopathy Caused By Drug Interactions). 
  
Myopathy Caused By Drug Interactions 
  
The incidence and severity of myopathy are increased by concomitant administration of 
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors with drugs that can cause myopathy when given alone, 
such as gemfibrozil and other fibrates, and lipid-lowering doses (³1 g/day) of niacin 
(nicotinic acid). 
  
In addition, the risk of myopathy appears to be increased by high levels of HMG-CoA 
reductase inhibitory activity in plasma. Simvastatin is metabolized by the cytochrome 
P450 isoform 3A4. Certain drugs which share this metabolic pathway can raise the 
plasma levels of simvastatin and may increase the risk of myopathy. These include 
cyclosporine, itraconazole, ketoconazole, and other antifungal azoles, the macrolide 
antibiotics erythromycin and clarithromycin, HIV protease inhibitors, and the 
antidepressant nefazodone. 
  
Reducing the Risk of Myopathy 
  
1. General Measures: Patients starting therapy with simvastatin should be advised 
of the risk of myopathy, and told to report promptly unexplained muscle pain, 
tenderness or weakness. A CK level above 10´ ULN in a patient with unexplained 
muscle symptoms indicates myopathy. Simvastatin therapy should be discontinued if 
myopathy is diagnosed or suspected. In most cases, when patients were promptly 
discontinued from treatment, muscle symptoms and CK increases resolved. 
  
Of the patients with rhabdomyolysis, many had complicated medical histories. Some had 
preexisting renal insufficiency, usually as a consequence of long-standing diabetes. In such 
patients, dose escalation requires caution. Also, as there are no known adverse 
consequences of brief interruption of therapy, treatment with simvastatin should be 
stopped a few days before elective major surgery and when any major acute medical or 
surgical condition supervenes. 
  
2. Measures to Reduce the Risk of Myopathy Caused By Drug Interactions: (See 
General Measures and DRUG INTERACTIONS). Physicians contemplating 
combined therapy with simvastatin and any of the interacting drugs should weigh 
the potential benefits and risks, and should carefully monitor patients for any signs 
and symptoms of muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness, particularly during the 
initial months of therapy and during any periods of upward dosage titration of 
either drug. Periodic CK determinations may be considered in such situations, but there 
is no assurance that such monitoring will prevent myopathy. 
  
The combined use of simvastatin with fibrates or niacin should be avoided unless the 
benefit of further alteration in lipid levels is likely to outweigh the increased risk of this 
drug combination. Combinations of fibrates or niacin with low doses of simvastatin have 
been used without myopathy in small, short-term clinical studies with careful monitoring. 
Addition of these drugs to simvastatin typically provides little additional reduction in 
LDL-C, but further reductions of TG and further increases in HDL-C may be obtained. If 
one of these drugs must be used with simvastatin, clinical experience suggests that the risk 
of myopathy is less with niacin than with the fibrates. 
  
In patients taking concomitant cyclosporine, fibrates or niacin, the dose of 
simvastatin should generally not exceed 10 mg (see DOSAGE AND 
ADMINISTRATION, General Recommendations and Concomitant Lipid-Lowering 
Therapy), as the risk of myopathy increases substantially at higher doses. Interruption of 
simvastatin therapy during a course of treatment with a systemic antifungal azole or a 
macrolide antibiotic should be considered. 
  
Liver Dysfunction 
  
Persistent increases (to more than 3´ the ULN) in serum transaminases have 
occurred in approximately 1% of patients who received simvastatin in clinical 
studies. When drug treatment was interrupted or discontinued in these patients, the 
transaminase levels usually fell slowly to pretreatment levels. The increases were not 
associated with jaundice or other clinical signs or symptoms. There was no evidence of 
hypersensitivity. 
  
In 4S (see CLINICAL STUDIES), the number of patients with more than one 
transaminase elevation to >3´ ULN, over the course of the study, was not significantly 
different between the simvastatin and placebo groups (14 [0.7%] vs. 12 [0.6%]). 
Elevated transaminases resulted in the discontinuation of 8 patients from therapy in the 
simvastatin group (n=2221) and 5 in the placebo group (n=2223). Of the 1986 
simvastatin treated patients in 4S with normal liver function tests (LFTs) at baseline, only 
8 (0.4%) developed consecutive LFT elevations to >3´ ULN and/or were discontinued 
due to transaminase elevations during the 5.4 years (median follow-up) of the study. 
Among these 8 patients, 5 initially developed these abnormalities within the first year. All 
of the patients in this study received a starting dose of 20 mg of simvastatin; 37% were 
titrated to 40 mg. 
  
In 2 controlled clinical studies in 1105 patients, the 12-month incidence of persistent 
hepatic transaminase elevation without regard to drug relationship was 0.9% and 2.1% at 
the 40- and 80-mg dose, respectively. No patients developed persistent liver function 
abnormalities following the initial 6 months of treatment at a given dose. 
  
It is recommended that liver function tests be performed before the initiation of 
treatment, and periodically thereafter (e.g., semiannually) for the first year of 
treatment or until one year after the last elevation in dose. Patients titrated to the 
80-mg dose should receive an additional test at 3 months. Patients who develop 
increased transaminase levels should be monitored with a second liver function evaluation 
to confirm the finding and be followed thereafter with frequent liver function tests until the 
abnormality(ies) return to normal. Should an increase in AST or ALT of 3´ ULN or 
greater persist, withdrawal of therapy with simvastatin is recommended. 
  
The drug should be used with caution in patients who consume substantial quantities of 
alcohol and/or have a past history of liver disease. Active liver diseases or unexplained 
transaminase elevations are contraindications to the use of simvastatin. 
  
As with other lipid-lowering agents, moderate (less than 3´ ULN) elevations of serum 
transaminases have been reported following therapy with simvastatin. These changes 
appeared soon after initiation of therapy with simvastatin, were often transient, were not 
accompanied by any symptoms and did not require interruption of treatment. 
  
PRECAUTIONS 
  
General 
  
Simvastatin may cause elevation of CK and transaminase levels (see WARNINGS and 
ADVERSE REACTIONS). This should be considered in the differential diagnosis of 
chest pain in a patient on therapy with simvastatin. 
  
Information for the Patient 
  
Patients should be advised to report promptly unexplained muscle pain, tenderness, or 
weakness (see WARNINGS, Skeletal Muscle). 
  
CNS Toxicity 
  
Optic nerve degeneration was seen in clinically normal dogs treated with simvastatin for 
14 weeks at 180 mg/kg/day, a dose that produced mean plasma drug levels about 12 
times higher than the mean drug level in humans taking 80 mg/day. 
  
A chemically similar drug in this class also produced optic nerve degeneration (Wallerian 
degeneration of retinogeniculate fibers) in clinically normal dogs in a dose-dependent 
fashion starting at 60 mg/kg/day, a dose that produced mean plasma drug levels about 30 
times higher than the mean drug level in humans taking the highest recommended dose (as 
measured by total enzyme inhibitory activity). This same drug also produced 
vestibulocochlear Wallerian-like degeneration and retinal ganglion cell chromatolysis in 
dogs treated for 14 weeks at 180 mg/kg/day, a dose that resulted in a mean plasma drug 
level similar to that seen with the 60 mg/kg/day dose. 
  
CNS vascular lesions, characterized by perivascular hemorrhage and edema, 
mononuclear cell infiltration of perivascular spaces, perivascular fibrin deposits, and 
necrosis of small vessels were seen in dogs treated with simvastatin at a dose of 360 
mg/kg/day, a dose that produced mean plasma drug levels that were about 14 times 
higher than the mean drug levels in humans taking 80 mg/day. Similar CNS vascular 
lesions have been observed with several other drugs of this class. 
  
There were cataracts in female rats after 2 years of treatment with 50 and 100 mg/kg/day 
(22 and 25 times the human AUC at 80 mg/day, respectively) and in dogs after 3 months 
at 90 mg/kg/day (19 times) and at 2 years at 50 mg/kg/day (5 times). 
  
Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, and Impairment of Fertility 
  
In a 72-week carcinogenicity study, mice were administered daily doses of simvastatin of 
25, 100, and 400 mg/kg body weight, which resulted in mean plasma drug levels 
approximately 1, 4, and 8 times higher than the mean human plasma drug level, 
respectively (as total inhibitory activity based on AUC) after an 80-mg oral dose. Liver 
carcinomas were significantly increased in high-dose females and mid- and high-dose 
males with a maximum incidence of 90% in males. The incidence of adenomas of the liver 
was significantly increased in mid- and high-dose females. Drug treatment also 
significantly increased the incidence of lung adenomas in mid- and high-dose males and 
females. Adenomas of the Harderian gland (a gland of the eye of rodents) were 
significantly higher in high-dose mice than in controls. No evidence of a tumorigenic effect 
was observed at 25 mg/kg/day. 
  
In a separate 92-week carcinogenicity study in mice at doses up to 25 mg/kg/day, no 
evidence of a tumorigenic effect was observed (mean plasma drug levels were 1 times 
higher than humans given 80 mg simvastatin as measured by AUC). 
  
In a two-year study in rats at 25 mg/kg/day, there was a statistically significant increase in 
the incidence of thyroid follicular adenomas in female rats exposed to approximately 11 
times higher levels of simvastatin than in humans given 80 mg simvastatin (as measured by 
AUC). 
  
A second two-year rat carcinogenicity study with doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg/day 
produced hepatocellular adenomas and carcinomas (in female rats at both doses and in 
males at 100 mg/kg/day). Thyroid follicular cell adenomas were increased in males and 
females at both doses; thyroid follicular cell carcinomas were increased in females at 100 
mg/kg/day. The increased incidence of thyroid neoplasms appears to be consistent with 
findings from other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. These treatment levels represented 
plasma drug levels (AUC) of approximately 7 and 15 times (males) and 22 and 25 times 
(females) the mean human plasma drug exposure after an 80 milligram daily dose. 
  
No evidence of mutagenicity was observed in a microbial mutagenicity (Ames) test with 
or without rat or mouse liver metabolic activation. In addition, no evidence of damage to 
genetic material was noted in an in vitro alkaline elution assay using rat hepatocytes, a 
V-79 mammalian cell forward mutation study, an in vitro chromosome aberration study 
in CHO cells, or an in vivo chromosomal aberration assay in mouse bone marrow. 
  
There was decreased fertility in male rats treated with simvastatin for 34 weeks at 25 
mg/kg body weight (4 times the maximum human exposure level, based on AUC, in 
patients receiving 80 mg/day); however, this effect was not observed during a subsequent 
fertility study in which simvastatin was administered at this same dose level to male rats 
for 11 weeks (the entire cycle of spermatogenesis including epididymal maturation). No 
microscopic changes were observed in the testes of rats from either study. At 180 
mg/kg/day, (which produces exposure levels 22 times higher than those in humans taking 
80 mg/day based on surface area, mg/m2), seminiferous tubule degeneration (necrosis 
and loss of spermatogenic epithelium) was observed. In dogs, there was drug-related 
testicular atrophy, decreased spermatogenesis, spermatocytic degeneration and giant cell 
formation at 10 mg/kg/day, (approximately 2 times the human exposure, based on AUC, 
at 80 mg/day). The clinical significance of these findings is unclear. 
  
Pregnancy Category X 
  
See CONTRAINDICATIONS. 
  
Safety in pregnant women has not been established. 
  
Simvastatin was not teratogenic in rats at doses of 25 mg/kg/day or in rabbits at doses up 
to 10 mg/kg daily. These doses resulted in 3 times (rat) or 3 times (rabbit) the human 
exposure based on mg/m2 surface area. However, in studies with another 
structurally-related HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, skeletal malformations were observed 
in rats and mice. 
  
Rare reports of congenital anomalies have been received following intrauterine exposure 
to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. In a review1 of approximately 100 prospectively 
followed pregnancies in women exposed to simvastatin or another structurally related 
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, the incidences of congenital anomalies, spontaneous 
abortions and fetal deaths/stillbirths did not exceed what would be expected in the 
general population. The number of cases is adequate only to exclude a 3- to 4-fold 
increase in congenital anomalies over the background incidence. In 89% of the 
prospectively followed pregnancies, drug treatment was initiated prior to pregnancy and 
was discontinued at some point in the first trimester when pregnancy was identified. As 
safety in pregnant women has not been established and there is no apparent benefit to 
therapy with simvastatin during pregnancy (see CONTRAINDICATIONS), treatment 
should be immediately discontinued as soon as pregnancy is recognized. Simvastatin 
should be administered to women of child-bearing potential only when such patients are 
highly unlikely to conceive and have been informed of the potential hazards. 
  
Nursing Mothers 
  
It is not known whether simvastatin is excreted in human milk. Because a small amount of 
another drug in this class is excreted in human milk and because of the potential for 
serious adverse reactions in nursing infants, women taking simvastatin should not nurse 
their infants (see CONTRAINDICATIONS). 
  
Pediatric Use 
  
Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established. Because pediatric 
patients are not likely to benefit from cholesterol lowering for at least a decade and 
because experience with this drug is limited (no studies in subjects below the age of 20 
years), treatment of pediatric patients with simvastatin is not recommended at this time.